Med. praxi. 2022;19(4):279-283 | DOI: 10.36290/med.2022.043

The role of pioglitazon in modern treatment of type 2 diabetes

MUDr. Pavlína Pi»hová, Ph.D.
Interní klinika UK 2. LF a FN v Motole, Praha

Type 2 diabetes patients are at high risk for macrovascular complications and suffer from very high cardiovascular mortality. Recent trials have demonstrated that agents in two antidiabetic classes (SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists) are able to reduce cardiovascular complications in diabetics. People have forgotten that very similar evidence is available also in an older preparation - pioglitazone, which can retard the atherosclerotic process and reduce cardiovascular events. Pioglitazone is an insulin sensitizer, that causes durable improvement of metabolic control and improves multiple components of metabolic syndrome including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Treatment with pioglitazone is accompanied by some adverse effects but is still usable in the treatment schema in type 2 diabetic patients.

Keywords: type 2 diabetes, insulin resistence, insulin sensitizers, pioglitazone.

Published: September 29, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pi»hová P. The role of pioglitazon in modern treatment of type 2 diabetes. Med. praxi. 2022;19(4):279-283. doi: 10.36290/med.2022.043.
Download citation

References

  1. Low Wang CC, Hess CN, Hiatt WR, et al. Clinical update: cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus - mechanisms, management, and clinical considerations. Circulation 2016;133:2459-2502. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. DeFronzo RA. Insulin resistance, lipotoxicity, type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis: the missing links: the Claude Bernard Lecture 2009. Diabetologia. 2010;53:1270-1287. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood­‑glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352:837-853. Go to original source...
  4. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321:405-412. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Saltiel AR, Olefsky JM. Thiazolidinediones in the treatment of insulin resistance and type II diabetes. Diabetes. 1996 Dec;45(12):1661-9. doi: 10.2337/diab.45. 12. 1661. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. DeFronzo RA, Inzucchi S, Abdul‑Ghani M, Nissen SE. Pioglitazone: The forgotten, cost‑effective cardioprotective drug for type 2 diabetes. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2019;16:133-143. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Goldberg RB, Kendall DM, Deeg MA, et al.; GLAI Study Investigators. A comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1547-1554. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Alam F, Islam MA, Mohamed M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta‑Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5389. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. DeFronzo RA, Tripathy D, Schwenke DC, et al. Pioglitazone for diabetes prevention in impaired glucose tolerance. New Engl J Med. 2011;364:1104-1115. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Deeg MA, Buse JB, Goldberg RB, et al.; GLAI Study Investigators. Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have different effects on serum lipoprotein particle concentrations and sizes in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:2458-2464. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product­‑information/pioglitazone­‑actavis­‑epar­‑product­‑information_cs.pdf
  12. Mazzone T, Meyer PM, Feinstein SB, et al. Effect of pioglitazone compared with glimepiride on carotid intima‑media thickness in type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;296:2572-2581. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Koshiyama H, Shimono D, Kuwamura N, et al. Rapid communication: inhibitory effect of pioglitazone on carotid arterial wall thickness in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:3452-3456. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Nissen SE, Nicholls SJ, Wolski K, et al. Comparison of pioglitazone vs glimepiride on progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: the PERISCOPE randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299:1561-1573. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Nishio K, Sakurai M, Kusuyama T, et al. A randomized comparison of pioglitazone to inhibit restenosis after coronary stenting in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:101-106. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Patel D, Walitt B, Lindsay J, Wilensky RL. Role of pioglitazone in the prevention of restenosis and need for revascularization after bare‑metal stent implantation: a meta‑analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2011;4:353-360. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Althouse AD, Abbott JD, Sutton‑Tyrrell K, et al. Favorable effects of insulin sensitizers pertinent to peripheral arterial disease in type 2 diabetes: results from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3269-3275. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Dormandy JA, Betteridge DJ, Schernthaner G, et al. PROactive investigators. Impact of peripheral arterial disease in patients with diabetes - results from PROactive (PROactive 11). Atherosclerosis. 2009;202:272-281. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJ, et al. Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive study (PROspective pioglitazone clinical trial in macrovascular events): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1279-1289. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Erdmann E, Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, et al. The effect of pioglitazone on recurrent myocardial infarction in 2,445 patients with type 2 diabetes and previous myocardial infarction: results from the PROactive (PROactive 05) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1772-1780. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Wilcox R, Bousser MG, Betteridge DJ, et al. Effects of pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes with or without previous stroke: results from PROactive (PROspective pioglitazone clinical trial in macrovascular events 04). Stroke. 2007;38:865-873. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Young LH, Viscoli CM, Inzucchi SE, et al. Cardiac outcomes after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: effects of pioglitazone in patients with insulin resistence without diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2017;135:1882-1893. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Vaccaro O, Masulli M, Nicolucci A, et al. Effects on their incidence of cardiovascular events of the addition of pioglitazonem versus sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (TOSCA.IT): a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:887-897. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Tzoulaki I, Molokhia M, Curcin V, et al. Risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed oral antidiabetes drugs: retrospective cohort study using UK general practice research database. BMJ. 2009;339:b4731. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Morgan CL, Poole CD, Evans M, et al. What next after metformin? A retrospective evaluation of the outcome of second­‑line, glucose­‑lowering therapies in people with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocr Metab. 2012;97:4605- 4612. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Morgan CL, Inzucchi SE, Pulles J, et al. Impact of treatment with pioglitazone on stroke outcomes: a real world database analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:2140- 2147. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Tseng CH. Pioglitazone Reduces Dementia Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. J Clin Med. 2018;7:306. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. DeFronzo RA. Combination therapy with GLP-1 receptor agonist and SGLT2 inhibitor. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:1353-1362. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Karasek D. Vliv antidiabeticke lečby na kost nemocnych s DM 2. typu. Vnitř Lek. 2016;62:582-587. Go to PubMed...
  30. SÚKL upozorňuje: pioglitazon a riziko kostních fraktur u ľen. Farmakoterapeutické informace 5/2007.
  31. Adil M, Khan RA, Ghosh P, et al. Pioglitazone and risk of bladder cancer in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A systematic literature review and meta‑analysis of observational studies using real‑world data. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2018;6:61-68. Go to original source...
  32. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, Draznin B, Aroda VR, Bakris G, et al. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(Suppl 1):S125-S143. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S009. PMID: 34964831. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Medicine for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.