Med. Pro Praxi 2007; 4(12): 528-530

Diagnostika a léčba urolitiázy

MUDr. Aleš Vidlář
Urologická klinika FN a LF UP v Olomouci

Published: January 16, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vidlář A. Diagnostika a léčba urolitiázy. Med. praxi. 2007;4(12):528-530.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Davenport K, Timoney AG, Keeley FX. Conventional and alternative methods for providing analgesia in renal colic. BJU Int 2005; 95: 297-300. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Dellabella M, Milanese G, Muzzonigro G. Randomized trial of the efficacy of tamsulosin, nifedipine and phloroglucinol in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculi. J Urol 2005; 174: 167-72. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Grasso M, Loisides P, Beaghler M, Bagley D. The case for primary endoscopic management of upper Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS Jr. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 2005; 173: 1991-2000. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Gravina GL, Costa AM, Ronchi P, Galatioto GP, Angelucci A, Castellani D et al. Tamsulosin treatment increases clinical success rate of single extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones. Urology 2005; 66: 24-28. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Hradec E. Urolithiasa. Cas lek Ces, 1999; 128: 257-261.
    6. Chandhoke PS. When is medical prophylaxis cost-effective for recurrent calcium stones? J Urol 2002; 168: 937-940. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Moe OW. Kidney stones: pathophysiology and medical management. Lancet 2006; 367: 333-344. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Pace KT, Weir MJ, Tariq N, Honey RJ. Low success rate of repeat shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones after failed initial treatment. J Urol 2000; 164: 1905-1907. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Pacík D, Hanák T, Kumstát P et al. Effectiveness of ESWL for lower-pole caliceal nephrolithiasis: evaluation of 452 cases. J Endourol 1997; 11: 305-307. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R, Kuo R, Preminger GM, Nadler RB et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 2005; 173: 2005-2009. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Rajmon P. Diagnostický postup při urolitiáze. Urolog. praxi, 2003; 4: 168-170.
    12. Ramakumar S, Segura JW. Renal calculi. Percutaneous management. Urol Clin North Am 2000; 27: 617-622. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Stejskal D. Etiopatogeneze a metafylaxe metabolických poruch a rizik urolitiázy Urolog. praxi, 2002; 6: 234-241.
    14. Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P, Buck C, Conort P, Gallucci M. Guidelines on urolithiasis. EAU.
    15. Vieweg J, Teh C, Freed K, Leder RA, Smith RH, Nelson RH, et al. Unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain. J Urol 1998; 160 (3 Pt 1): 679-684. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    Return to the content


    Medicine for Practice

    Madam, Sir,
    please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
    Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

    I declare:

    1. that I have met the above instruction
    2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited

    No
    Yes

    If your statement is not true, please be aware
    that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.